Termination
Can employer prohibit moonlighting? Learn when employers can limit side gigs, how outside employment policy legal rules work, and what to do if you’re fired for second job. Get clear guidance on moonlighting restrictions enforceability, side gig at work rules, and conflict of interest outside employment.
Estimated reading time: 18 minutes
Key Takeaways
Employers can sometimes restrict moonlighting, but blanket bans are often limited by law, contracts, and employee rights under federal and state statutes.
A lawful outside employment policy is narrowly tailored to protect legitimate interests like trade secrets, safety, and performance, and it aligns with labor laws.
The National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) protects concerted activity; overbroad rules that chill protected rights can be unlawful.
Some jurisdictions, including Washington and the District of Columbia, limit broad anti-moonlighting prohibitions through court decisions and local statutes.
If you were fired for a second job, act fast: gather documents, review policies and contracts, check local law, and evaluate whether the termination violated a statute or agreement.
Table of Contents
Introduction
What Is Moonlighting / Outside Employment?
Legal Framework & What an Outside Employment Policy Is
Sources of Regulation Affecting Policies
Enforceability Standard
Elements of a Defensible Outside Employment Policy
Can Employers Prohibit Moonlighting?
Scenario A — Contract or Handbook Restrictions
Scenario B — Protecting Trade Secrets, Safety, or Preventing Competition
Scenario C — Broad Bans That Overreach
Scenario D — State and Local Protections
Quick Policy Checklist for Employees
Moonlighting Restrictions: How Enforceable Are They?
Common Factors in Enforceability
Examples: Enforceable vs. Unenforceable
Conflict of Interest & Outside Employment
Clear Examples of Conflicts
Evaluating Your Own Risk
If You’re Fired for a Second Job: What to Do
Immediate Steps After Termination
When Termination May Be Unlawful
Realistic Outcomes and Limitations
Side Gig at Work Rules: What Employers Commonly Prohibit & What You Should Know
Common Employer Rules
Practical Compliance Tips
How to Protect Your Lawful Side Job
Step-by-Step Protection Checklist
Negotiating and Advocating with HR
Sample Policy Language & Employee Examples
Sample Clauses Likely Defensible
Short Employee Scenarios
References / Further Reading
Conclusion
FAQ
Can employer prohibit moonlighting outright?
What should I do if I’m fired for a second job?
Are there jurisdictions that protect moonlighting?
What are typical side gig at work rules?
Is a written outside employment policy legal?
Introduction
Can employer prohibit moonlighting? In some situations, yes—employers can restrict moonlighting, but broad bans are often limited by law and contract. This guide explains where those lines are drawn and how to protect a lawful side job under typical side gig at work rules and an outside employment policy legal framework.
Moonlighting means holding a second job or engaging in outside employment (a side gig) in addition to your primary job. It commonly refers to work performed outside regular hours for another employer or as a freelancer or contractor, and it has a long history in U.S. workplaces, reflected in the legal definition of moonlighting.
More workers take on second jobs due to gig-economy platforms, financial pressures, and career development goals. Employers often worry about performance, conflicts of interest, and confidentiality, and many adopt policies to address those concerns. Industry commentary underscores both the rise of outside work and the need to balance worker rights with employer interests, including practical insights from DuboffLaw’s overview and global perspectives from the International Bar Association’s Future of Work discussion.
This article breaks down the legal limits, typical policy features, what to do if you are disciplined or fired, and concrete steps to protect your lawful side gig. It also flags where federal labor protections and state or local laws may override company rules.
What Is Moonlighting / Outside Employment?
Moonlighting is working a second job or running another business while employed by a primary employer. Outside employment (or “side gig”) covers freelancing, contract work, your own business, or part-time employment outside your regular hours, consistent with the legal definition of moonlighting and broader commentary on outside work by leading employment analysts, including Perkins Coie.
Common reasons employees moonlight include earning extra income, building skills, pursuing passion projects, or stabilizing finances. These motivations are well-recognized in employment law analyses like DuboffLaw’s primer.
Employers’ typical concerns include job performance problems, fatigue, conflicts of interest, confidentiality risks, and misuse of company resources. Courts and advisors often accept those as legitimate, provided restrictions are carefully drawn, as discussed in Morgan Lewis’s analysis of recent case law. Understanding outside employment policy legal boundaries, side gig at work rules, and conflict of interest outside employment helps employees evaluate risks and compliance steps.
Legal Framework & What an Outside Employment Policy Is
An outside employment policy is a written rule—often in an employee handbook or contract—that explains what types of outside work are permitted, disclosure and approval requirements, limits on using employer resources, and the potential consequences for violating the policy. It’s a tool many organizations use to manage risks in a world where outside work is common, a trend highlighted by the IBA’s Future of Work insight and U.S. practice overviews such as DuboffLaw.
Sources of Regulation Affecting Policies
Several legal sources shape whether an outside employment policy legal approach is valid:
Employment contracts and handbooks: A written clause or policy may set approval procedures and limits on outside work.
Federal labor law: The NLRA protects “concerted activity,” and the National Labor Relations Board’s leadership has cautioned that broad anti-moonlighting rules can chill protected rights. See the summary of recent guidance in Manatt’s coverage of the NLRB General Counsel memo and compare with this practical guide to protected concerted activity rights.
State and local statutes: Some jurisdictions restrict broad employer bans. For example, the District of Columbia provides protections for workers’ outside employment, summarized in the National Law Review.
Enforceability Standard
As a rule of thumb, moonlighting restrictions are more likely enforceable when they are narrowly tailored to protect legitimate business interests (like trade secrets, safety, and avoiding direct competition), clearly written and communicated, and consistent with federal and state labor law. This framework is emphasized by DuboffLaw’s enforceability discussion and recent case analysis from Morgan Lewis.
Elements of a Defensible Outside Employment Policy
Clear definitions and prohibited activities: For example, working for direct competitors, using confidential information or client lists, or creating safety risks.
Disclosure and approval process: Explain when and how to request approval for outside work and how the employer will evaluate potential conflicts.
Prohibition on using company time or resources: No use of company systems, networks, or work hours for side work.
Consistency with law and non-retaliation: Where required, clarify that lawful off-duty conduct is respected and the company will not retaliate for protected activities.
These elements reflect a policy model aligned with moonlighting restrictions enforceability, while helping employees understand what compliance looks like in practice.
Can Employers Prohibit Moonlighting?
Employers can impose restrictions in some circumstances, but blanket prohibitions are often limited or unlawful depending on contract terms, state or local law, and federal protections like the NLRA. Analyses from DuboffLaw and the NLRB General Counsel memo covered by Manatt reflect this balance.
Scenario A — Contract or Handbook Restrictions
Written employment contracts or explicit handbook policies can restrict certain outside work if the restrictions are reasonable and not in conflict with a statute. For example, a policy may require disclosure, prohibit work for direct competitors, or forbid use of company time and confidential data. Overviews of how such clauses work in practice can be found in Steinsperling’s guidance. This is a classic outside employment policy legal scenario, and employees should read those provisions closely before starting a side job.
Scenario B — Protecting Trade Secrets, Safety, or Preventing Competition
Restrictions aimed at protecting trade secrets, safety, or preventing direct competition are more likely to be upheld if they are narrowly tailored and tied to real business interests. Recent case law cautions against sweeping bans while recognizing that targeted rules can stand; see Morgan Lewis’s case analysis. For deeper context on employer confidentiality and restrictive covenants, review this guide to trade secret protections and employment agreements and considerations around non-compete enforceability.
Scenario C — Broad Bans That Overreach
Blanket rules banning all outside work, without justification, are legally vulnerable. They may chill Section 7 rights under the NLRA (protecting concerted activity), and the NLRB has signaled that overbroad anti-moonlighting clauses can be unlawful. See the discussion in Manatt’s summary of the NLRB General Counsel’s position and compare with practical guidance on protected concerted activity.
Scenario D — State and Local Protections
Some jurisdictions limit broad bans with statutes or court decisions. Washington has seen decisions that caution employers to narrow their rules, while D.C. provides explicit protections for lawful off-duty work subject to exceptions. For evolving Washington guidance, read Perkins Coie’s analysis and Morgan Lewis’s update. For D.C. statutory protections, see the National Law Review summary.
Quick Policy Checklist for Employees
Is there a written clause in your employment contract or handbook about outside jobs?
Does the policy define prohibited activities or list examples (competitors, using IP or client lists)?
Is there a disclosure or approval process? What does it require and how long does it take?
Does the policy ban working only during company time or all outside work?
Does your state or city provide statutory protections for lawful off-duty employment?
These questions help assess can employer prohibit moonlighting in your specific context and whether moonlighting restrictions enforceability concerns apply.
Moonlighting Restrictions: How Enforceable Are They?
Courts and agencies ask three core questions: does the restriction serve a legitimate business interest, is it narrowly tailored, and does it conflict with statutory employee rights (under the NLRA or state law)? This legal test is discussed in DuboffLaw’s commentary, the NLRB General Counsel memo covered by Manatt, and recent case updates from Morgan Lewis.
Common Factors in Enforceability
Specificity: Clear, precise language is stronger than vague terms like “any conflicting interests.”
Legitimate interests: Protecting confidential information, mitigating safety risks, and avoiding direct competition are recognized interests.
Consistent application: Uneven or discriminatory enforcement can undermine a policy’s legitimacy.
Local environment: State statutes and court precedents (e.g., D.C. law, Washington decisions) strongly influence outcomes.
Examples: Enforceable vs. Unenforceable
Enforceable: A policy prohibiting selling the employer’s proprietary product on the side using company client lists, tied to concrete trade secret and loyalty concerns. See the reasoning trends outlined by Morgan Lewis.
Potentially unenforceable: A blanket clause forbidding any outside work without justification. Such a restriction may chill employees’ NLRA rights and be struck down, as discussed in Manatt’s memo summary.
If you’re unsure, compare your policy against these examples and the enforceability factors above. When policies stray into non-compete territory, consider reviewing best practices on non-compete agreement enforceability.
Conflict of Interest & Outside Employment
A conflict of interest outside employment exists when a side job competes with, undercuts, or otherwise impairs your duties to your primary employer or results in misuse of confidential information or company resources. This framing is consistent with analyses in DuboffLaw and Morgan Lewis’s case updates.
Clear Examples of Conflicts
Working for a direct competitor or soliciting your employer’s customers.
Doing freelance work during company time or using employer equipment or data for your side gig.
Starting a business that uses the employer’s confidential processes, source code, or client lists.
Employers may respond to genuine conflicts with disclosure requirements, role reassignment, or tailored prohibitions. Overbroad actions—like banning all outside work regardless of risk—invite legal scrutiny. For context on trade secret and NDA risks, see this trade secret and NDA guide.
Evaluating Your Own Risk
Does your side gig use any proprietary tools, information, customer relationships, or company time?
Could the side work reasonably impair your performance, responsiveness, or safety at work?
If the answer to either is “yes,” address the conflict by restructuring the side gig, seeking pre-approval, or declining certain work. When in doubt, ask HR for written clarification and retain a copy.
If You’re Fired for a Second Job: What to Do
Being fired for second job concerns is stressful—and time-sensitive. Can employer prohibit moonlighting in your case may hinge on your contract, the policy’s language, and whether state or federal law protects your outside work. Here’s a step-by-step plan.
Immediate Steps After Termination
Request the reason in writing: Ask for a termination letter or documentation stating the policy or contract provision relied upon.
Collect your documents: Find your employment contract, offer letter, handbook, any non-compete or confidentiality agreements, and the outside employment policy.
Check your jurisdiction’s law: D.C. and Washington impose limits on broad bans; see the National Law Review summary for D.C. and Perkins Coie’s Washington analysis.
Evaluate contract compliance: Determine whether the employer followed any written procedures or exceeded its policy. Practical guidance on contract limitations appears in Steinsperling.
Assess federal labor rights: If the policy or discipline chills NLRA-protected concerted activity, consider options highlighted in Manatt’s summary and review your NLRA concerted activity rights.
Preserve evidence: Keep records of hours, communications, and proof you avoided side gig tasks during company time.
If the termination appears retaliatory or inconsistent with the policy, you may also explore broader remedies for wrongful termination scenarios. If the employer escalates with legal claims (e.g., breach of loyalty or trade secret), consult a resource on defending against an employer lawsuit quickly.
When Termination May Be Unlawful
Retaliation or interference with NLRA rights (e.g., overbroad policies chilling concerted activity).
Discrimination or retaliation unrelated to genuine conflicts of interest.
Breach of contract or failure to follow policy procedures (e.g., skipped approval process).
Violation of local law (e.g., jurisdictions that protect lawful off-duty work absent conflict).
Realistic Outcomes and Limitations
In most states, employment is “at-will,” meaning employers can terminate for any lawful, non-discriminatory reason unless a statute, contract, or public policy says otherwise. Still, some jurisdictions (like D.C. or Washington) limit terminations based solely on lawful off-duty employment, subject to exceptions for conflicts or misuse of resources; see the district protections summarized in the National Law Review. When employers rely on sweeping bans or vague terms, legal risks increase for them and avenues for employees may open.
Side Gig at Work Rules: What Employers Commonly Prohibit & What You Should Know
Most outside employment policies focus on predictable risks. Understanding them helps you avoid policy violations and keep your side gig compliant.
Common Employer Rules
No side work during paid company time: Employers expect full attention during work hours. Guidance on company-time limits appears in international HR rounds, such as LeGlobal’s discussion of company-time restrictions.
No use of company equipment, email, or data for outside work.
Mandatory disclosure for certain categories of outside employment to evaluate conflicts.
No working for competitors or soliciting employer clients.
Avoid performance impairment (e.g., attendance, responsiveness, safety).
These themes align with policy purposes recognized by the IBA’s Future of Work insight and the U.S.-focused overview by DuboffLaw. They shape side gig at work rules employees should expect to see.
Practical Compliance Tips
Keep strict time separation: Do not perform side gig tasks during work hours; document your side-gig schedule.
Use personal devices and accounts only; never use company systems or data for outside work.
If disclosure is required, follow the process and save a copy of your request and any approval.
Ask HR for written clarification if any policy term is vague or unclear.
These steps reduce the risk of conflict of interest outside employment and bolster your compliance record if questions arise.
How to Protect Your Lawful Side Job
Protecting a side gig starts with understanding your obligations and drawing bright lines between your employer’s interests and your off-duty work. Here’s how to keep your outside work aligned with an outside employment policy legal framework.
Step-by-Step Protection Checklist
Review all written materials: Gather your employment agreement, offer letter, handbook, non-compete, confidentiality, and IP assignment agreements. Copy relevant clauses and note dates.
Spot red flags: Vague language like “any other employment” or “conflicting interests” can be overbroad and risky to enforce. See the cautionary notes in DuboffLaw’s discussion of overbroad clauses.
Keep strict separation: Never use company time, devices, networks, or confidential information. Maintain separate client lists, devices, and email accounts.
Consider pre-approval: If your side job might be perceived as a conflict, proactively disclose and request written approval; keep proof of submissions and responses.
Leverage local protections: If you work in a jurisdiction with moonlighting protections (e.g., D.C. or Washington), reference them in any HR discussion; see the D.C. summary and Washington case analysis.
Negotiate new agreements carefully: When starting a job, try to narrow restrictive clauses or secure carve-outs that allow specific side work.
Respond to discipline promptly: Collect documentation, compare the policy’s text to how it was applied, and seek legal advice if needed—see the overview from Steinsperling.
Negotiating and Advocating with HR
When asking for approval, provide a concise description of your side gig, the hours you will work (e.g., evenings or weekends), and an affirmative statement that you will not use company resources or time and will not work for competitors. Request written confirmation of approval or any conditions. If HR suggests changes, consider whether they are narrowly tailored to a legitimate business interest.
If the policy is unclear, ask HR to identify the legitimate interest at risk and propose a narrower condition that solves the concern (for example, restricting certain client categories rather than banning the entire side gig). This cooperative approach can demonstrate good faith and reduce conflict.
Sample Policy Language & Employee Examples
Below are examples of policy language that are reasonably tailored and more likely defensible because they target legitimate interests with specificity rather than banning all outside work. These examples reflect principles discussed by Morgan Lewis and evaluated in DuboffLaw.
Sample Clauses Likely Defensible
Narrow/conflict-focused clause: “Employees may engage in outside employment that does not compete with the Company, use or disclose Company confidential information, or materially interfere with job performance. Employees must disclose potential conflicts and obtain written approval for outside work in related industries.”
Safety-sensitive clause: “Employees in safety-sensitive positions may not undertake outside work that creates fatigue or safety risks incompatible with job duties, or that would violate licensing or regulatory obligations.”
Use-of-resources clause: “Employees may not use Company time, equipment, networks, or data for outside employment. All outside work must be conducted on personal time and using personal resources.”
Why these clauses are more defensible: Each is tied to a legitimate business interest (confidentiality, safety, performance) and uses clear terms rather than a sweeping prohibition.
Short Employee Scenarios
Scenario 1: A software engineer does freelance web design at night for non-competing local restaurants using personal devices and never during work hours. Outcome: Likely permitted unless a specific contract clause forbids it entirely; a narrow policy should accommodate it.
Scenario 2: A salesperson starts a side business using the employer’s client list to sell similar products. Outcome: Likely a violation of confidentiality and competition restrictions; discipline can be enforced under a targeted policy.
Scenario 3: An analyst accepts weekend work for a direct competitor, handling overlapping client accounts. Outcome: The employer can likely restrict or discipline if it breaches an explicit conflict-of-interest policy or duty of loyalty.
When disputes escalate toward restrictive covenant enforcement or confidential information claims, consult resources on restrictive covenants and trade secret obligations.
References / Further Reading
Steinsperling — Can employers restrict employees from having a second job?
Manatt — NLRB GC: Employers cannot restrict workers from moonlighting
Perkins Coie — Washington rulings caution employers on anti-moonlighting
Morgan Lewis — Washington Supreme Court clarifies limits on anti-moonlighting agreements
Conclusion
Employers may restrict moonlighting where narrow rules protect legitimate interests like trade secrets, safety, and performance. But broad bans are often legally vulnerable, especially when they chill protected rights or conflict with state or local statutes. Read your contracts and handbooks closely, follow reasonable side gig at work rules, document your compliance, and get guidance if you face discipline under an outside employment policy legal provision.
If you’re asking “can employer prohibit moonlighting?”, the short answer is: sometimes, but not always—and it depends on contract language, policy scope, moonlighting restrictions enforceability factors, and the laws that apply to your job.
Need help now? Get a free and instant case evaluation by US Employment Lawyers. See if your case qualifies within 30-seconds at https://usemploymentlawyers.com.
FAQ
Can employer prohibit moonlighting outright?
Generally, no. Employers can restrict outside work to protect legitimate interests, but blanket bans risk violating NLRA Section 7 rights and may be overbroad. Narrow, clearly justified rules fare better; see the NLRB GC guidance summarized by Manatt.
What should I do if I’m fired for a second job?
Get the reason in writing, pull your contract, handbook, and outside employment policy, check local law (e.g., D.C. protections), and evaluate whether the firing conflicts with a statute or contract. Overviews from Steinsperling and the National Law Review can help.
Are there jurisdictions that protect moonlighting?
Yes. The District of Columbia recognizes worker protections for lawful off-duty employment, and Washington decisions caution employers against overbroad bans. For details, read Perkins Coie’s analysis of Washington rulings.
What are typical side gig at work rules?
Common rules include no side work during paid hours, no use of company equipment or data, mandatory disclosure for potential conflicts, and no working for competitors. For perspective on company-time restrictions, see LeGlobal.
Is a written outside employment policy legal?
Often, yes—when it is narrowly tailored, clearly written, and consistent with federal and state law. Policies that serve legitimate interests and avoid overbroad bans are more defensible. This approach aligns with DuboffLaw’s enforceability analysis.
This article is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. For advice about your situation, consult an employment attorney in your jurisdiction.
